VaultNow Blog
Try free

1099 for Foreign Contractors: What You File, What You Don't, and Why W-8BEN Decides It

Most cross-border contractor payments generate no US information return at all, if you can prove where the work happened. The sourcing rule, the W-8BEN line by line, the new $2,000 threshold, and the two edge cases that cause most misfilings.

By VaultNow Team 20 min read
1099 for Foreign Contractors: What You File, What You Don't, and Why W-8BEN Decides It
Aug 2026
On this page
  1. The rule that decides everything
  2. W-8BEN is the document that makes the answer true
  3. When you do withhold: US-source payments
  4. The domestic side: 1099-NEC and the new $2,000 threshold
  5. Backup withholding: 24%, and it has to be cash
  6. Where crypto changes the analysis, and where it doesn’t
  7. Non-US payers have their own version of this
  8. The file you should be able to produce
  9. Frequently Asked Questions

The most expensive mistake in this area is issuing a form you didn’t owe. The second most expensive is skipping one you did.

Ask ten US finance teams whether they need a 1099 for foreign contractors and you’ll get four confident yeses, three confident noes, and three people who quietly issue one anyway because it feels safer. The confident answers are both wrong, because the question is malformed. There is no single rule for foreign contractors. There is a rule about where the work happens, a rule about who the payee is, and a set of forms that follow from those two facts.

Get those right and most cross-border contractor payments generate no US information return at all. Get them wrong and you’re either withholding 30% you didn’t need to withhold, or you’re the withholding agent on the hook for tax you failed to collect.

The rule that decides everything

Treasury Regulation §1.861-4 sources personal service income to the place where the services are performed. The IRS states it without qualification: the place where the personal services are performed “generally determines the source of the personal service income, regardless of where the contract was made, or the place of payment, or the residence of the payer.”

Read that again, because it inverts the intuition. Your company’s location doesn’t matter. The bank you paid from doesn’t matter. The contractor’s citizenship doesn’t matter. What matters is where their laptop was.

A Ukrainian developer working from Kyiv earns foreign-source income. A Ukrainian developer working from your office in Austin for three weeks earns US-source income for those three weeks. Same person, same contract, same invoice — two different tax outcomes, split by geography.

Foreign-source income paid to a non-US person produces:

  • No Form 1099. The 1099 series reports payments to US persons. A foreign person performing services abroad is outside its scope entirely.

  • No chapter 3 withholding.

  • No Form 1042-S. The instructions limit reportable amounts to “amounts from U.S. sources paid to foreign persons.”

So the honest answer to “do foreign contractors get 1099” is: usually no, provided they’re genuinely foreign persons doing the work outside the United States. But you still have paperwork to do, and it’s the paperwork that protects the position.

W-8BEN is the document that makes the answer true

Without a valid withholding certificate, the presumption rules under Treasury Regulation §1.1441-1(b)(3) kick in, and they don’t presume in your favour. A withholding agent that can’t establish the payee’s status “may have to withhold at the 30% rate.”

That’s the entire function of the W-8 series. It isn’t filed with the IRS. You collect it, you keep it, and it documents why you didn’t withhold and why you didn’t file.

Form W-8BEN — a foreign individual. The contractor certifies their foreign status, country of residence, and (if claiming treaty benefits) the relevant treaty article and a US TIN.

Form W-8BEN-E — a foreign entity. Longer, because it also handles FATCA chapter 4 status. This is the answer to the recurring “w 9 form for foreign companies” question: there isn’t one. A W-9 certifies that the payee is a US person. A foreign company that signs a W-9 is making a false certification. If a foreign vendor sends you a W-9, send it back and ask for a W-8BEN-E.

Validity period. A W-8BEN is good from the date signed “ending on the last day of the third succeeding calendar year” — so a form signed in March 2026 runs through 31 December 2029, unless a change in circumstances makes the information incorrect. Two qualifications. A W-8BEN carrying a US TIN can stay valid indefinitely until circumstances change, under Regulations section 1.1441-1(e)(4)(ii). And when they do change, the contractor has 30 days to tell you and file a new form, so put that obligation in the contract. Set a calendar reminder. An expired W-8 is functionally the same as no W-8.

Collect it before the first payment, not at year end. Chasing a withholding certificate from a contractor you’ve already paid, whose engagement ended in August, is a genuinely miserable exercise.

Filling it in: the lines that stall onboarding

The same four lines send this form back every time.

Part I, line 5 (US TIN). Optional for most contractors, mandatory if they’re claiming treaty benefits on US-source income. No TIN, no treaty rate, full 30%.

Part I, lines 6a and 6b (foreign TIN). This is the one that gets left blank. Enter the tax identification number issued by the country of residence on 6a, or tick 6b to confirm one isn’t legally required. Strictly it’s mandatory only where the form documents an account holder at a financial institution, but collect it anyway, because it is what makes the form matchable against the contractor’s own filings.

Part I, line 7 (reference numbers). Optional. Useful if you want your own vendor ID on the form for matching.

Part I, line 8 (date of birth). Required only where the form documents an account holder at a US office of a financial institution. For an ordinary vendor payment it’s optional, so don’t send a form back over it.

Part II, lines 9 and 10 (treaty claim). Only completed where the contractor is claiming a reduced rate. Line 9 names the treaty country; line 10 names the article, the rate and the type of income, and is used only where the benefit depends on conditions not covered by line 9 and Part III. For services income the claim belongs on Form 8233 instead.

Part III, signature. Must be signed and dated by the beneficial owner or an authorised agent. A typed name in a PDF field without a signature is a common failure.

For entities, the equivalent stall is W-8BEN-E chapter 4 (FATCA) status in Part I line 5. There are more than thirty options, most vendors pick the wrong one, and an inconsistent chapter 3 / chapter 4 pairing invalidates the form. If a foreign company sends you a W-8BEN-E with the FATCA status blank, it isn’t done.

The re-solicitation calendar

A W-8 signed 12 March 2026 is valid through 31 December 2029: the date of signature plus three succeeding calendar years. So the diary looks like this:

Event

When

Action

Form signed

12 Mar 2026

Store with the vendor record, not in an email thread

Change in circumstances

Any time

Contractor must notify; form becomes unreliable

Reminder

Q4 2029

Request a fresh form before expiry

Expiry

31 Dec 2029

Presumption rules apply from 1 Jan 2030

A change in circumstances is the trap, because it doesn’t wait for the calendar. A contractor who moves country, acquires a green card, or becomes a US resident under the substantial presence test has invalidated their W-8, and the obligation to tell you is theirs while the consequence of not knowing is yours. Put a one-line annual confirmation into your renewal process: has anything changed about your tax residence since you signed this?

Two edge cases nobody writes about

The US person living abroad. A US citizen or green card holder working from Lisbon is still a US person. They file a W-9, not a W-8, and you issue a 1099-NEC at the $2,000 threshold like any other US payee. Their physical location is irrelevant; their status isn’t. This is the single most common misfiling in this area. Companies assume “contractor abroad” means “no 1099” and skip the form for someone who was always in scope.

Partial US work. A contractor who spent 12 days of a 200-day engagement in the United States has US-source income for those 12 days. There is a statutory de minimis rule in §861(a)(3), 90 days or fewer and $3,000 or less, but it only applies where the payer is a foreign person or the foreign office of a US person, so a US company paying directly can’t reach it. The workable approach is a workday allocation: 12/200 of the fee is US-source and reports on Form 1042-S with withholding, and the remaining 188/200 is foreign-source and reports nowhere. Ask for a day count in writing at engagement end, keep it in the file, and apply the same method every year.

One more, if you pay through a platform. Where you settle via PayPal, Wise or another third-party settlement organisation, that platform files a Form 1099-K only once the payee’s gross payments pass $20,000 across more than 200 transactions, the pre-2021 threshold restored retroactively by the One Big Beautiful Bill. And a payee with a foreign address who has given the platform a W-8 sits outside 1099-K reporting altogether under Regulations section 1.6050W-1, so for a documented foreign contractor the collision doesn’t arise at all. Where 1099-K does apply, the payment isn’t also reported by you on 1099-NEC. Ask the platform what it files before year end rather than after.

When you do withhold: US-source payments

If any portion of the services was performed inside the US, that portion is US-source income and default withholding is 30% under chapter 3. Chapter 4 (FATCA) doesn’t reach payments for services at all: Regulations section 1.1473-1(a)(4)(iii) carves them out of the definition of a withholdable payment. Treaty relief can reduce or eliminate the 30%, the relevant articles are usually Independent Personal Services or Business Profits, but an individual claims it on Form 8233, not W-8BEN: the W-8BEN instructions expressly exclude compensation for personal services performed in the US and tell the payee to use Form 8233 instead. A US TIN is required either way. No TIN, no treaty rate.

Reporting runs on Forms 1042-S (per payee) and 1042 (the aggregate return), both due 15 March of the following year. Records should be retained, or reconstructible, for at least three years after the reporting due date.

Two practical notes. First, US-source days are easy to miss: a conference, a client visit, a two-week onsite sprint. If your contract contemplates any US presence, ask for a day count. Second, withholding is a dollar obligation. You remit cash to Treasury. If you’re paying that contractor in stablecoins, you need fiat set aside to cover it, and you need it before the payment goes out rather than after.

The domestic side: 1099-NEC and the new $2,000 threshold

For US-resident contractors, and for foreign persons performing services inside the US in a few edge cases, the reporting form is Form 1099-NEC, box 1a, nonemployee compensation.

The threshold changed, and a lot of published guidance hasn’t caught up. From the IRS instructions: “For tax years beginning after 2025, the minimum threshold amount…increased to $2,000 and may be adjusted for inflation beginning in calendar year 2027.”

What that means in practice:

TY2025

TY2026

TY2027

1099-NEC threshold

$600

$2,000

$2,000 + inflation adjustment

Filed in

Jan 2026

Jan 2027

Jan 2028

Deadline is 31 January, to both the IRS and the recipient, earlier than 1099-MISC, which runs to 28 February on paper or 31 March electronically.

Older guidance referring to Form 1099-MISC for crypto-denominated contractor payments (including Notice 2014-21’s Q-13) predates the reintroduction of the 1099-NEC in tax year 2020. Nonemployee compensation goes on the NEC, whatever the payment was made in.

File it even when you think you’re under the threshold. Here’s why that’s not just belt-and-braces: Section 530 relief, the safe harbour that protects you if the IRS reclassifies a contractor as an employee, requires reporting consistency, meaning timely filed information returns consistent with contractor treatment. Skip the 1099 and you forfeit Section 530 entirely. Rev. Proc. 2025-10, issued 8 January 2025, updated and superseded the old Rev. Proc. 85-18 on how that relief works, and Rev. Rul. 2025-3 walks through five fact patterns distinguishing Section 530 relief from the reduced rates under §3509.

The cost of getting this wrong is concrete. §3509 puts employer liability at 1.5% of wages plus 20% of the worker’s FICA share whenever you treated an employee as a non-employee, doubling to 3% and 40% where you also failed to file the required information returns unless that failure was due to reasonable cause and not wilful neglect, and disappearing entirely, leaving the full liability, where the failure to withhold was intentional disregard. The information-return penalties stack on top: for returns due in 2027, §6721 and §6722 run $60 if you correct within 30 days, $130 by 1 August, $340 after that or if you never file, and $680 per return with no annual cap where the failure is intentional disregard. A $12 form is cheap insurance against all of it.

Backup withholding: 24%, and it has to be cash

Missing or incorrect TIN on a US payee triggers backup withholding at 24%, remitted via Form 945. Notice 2014-21 Q-14 confirms that virtual currency payments are “subject to backup withholding to the same extent as other payments made in property.”

The mechanical problem is obvious once you see it. You cannot send the IRS 24% of a USDT payment in USDT. You either liquidate tokens to fiat to cover the withholding, or you gross up the payment and eat the difference. Either way the obligation is denominated in dollars and satisfied in dollars.

Publication 1281 covers the B-notice and C-notice procedures if you find yourself in this position. The better answer is to not get there: collect the W-9 or W-8 before the first payment and run a TIN match.

Where crypto changes the analysis, and where it doesn’t

It doesn’t change any of the above. Under IRS Notice 2014-21, digital assets are property for federal tax purposes. Q-3 requires the recipient to include “the fair market value of the virtual currency, measured in U.S. dollars, as of the date that the virtual currency was received.” Q-10 confirms that FMV received for independent contractor services “constitutes self-employment income and is subject to the self-employment tax.”

So a payment in USDT to a US contractor is reported on 1099-NEC box 1a at its USD fair market value on the payment date. Same box, same threshold, same deadline. The token is the delivery mechanism, not the character of the payment.

What crypto adds is a second tax event on your side that cash payments don’t have. When you pay in tokens you are disposing of property. You get an ordinary §162 deduction at FMV, and you recognise capital gain or loss against your basis in the tokens. For a stablecoin acquired near $1.00 and spent near $1.00, that number rounds to nothing, but it is not automatically zero, USDT and USDC do trade off peg, and there is no de minimis exemption in current law. Rev. Proc. 2024-28 requires basis to be tracked wallet-by-wallet from 1 January 2025, with no stablecoin carve-out. Allocations made under it were irrevocable.

The GENIUS Act, signed 18 July 2025, is banking and payments regulation. It set up a federal framework for payment stablecoins, reserve backing, audit, AML, and it did not touch the property characterisation for tax. Practitioners have been expecting a stablecoin-specific IRS position, and various de minimis exemption bills have circulated in Congress, but as of this writing neither has landed. Treat stablecoins as property until the IRS says otherwise. Our breakdown of what the GENIUS Act means for your business covers the regulatory side.

Form 1099-DA: you’re probably not a broker

This one causes more panic than it deserves. Form 1099-DA reports digital asset proceeds, and the final regulations define brokers as those who “take possession of the digital assets being sold by their customers”, custodial trading platforms, hosted wallet providers, kiosks, and processors of digital asset payments.

A company that pays its own contractors in stablecoins is not effecting sales for customers. It is not a broker and does not file 1099-DA.

Two things to be aware of anyway. Your exchange will issue you a 1099-DA on your own liquidations, gross proceeds reporting started 1 January 2025 and basis reporting from 1 January 2026. And if you use a third-party crypto payroll processor, that vendor may itself qualify as a payment processor with its own filing obligations. Ask them. The de minimis thresholds in the final regs are worth knowing: $10,000 for qualifying stablecoins, $600 for specified NFTs, $600 for payment-processor sales. The DeFi broker rule was repealed by H.J. Res. 25.

Also worth knowing: paying your own obligations in crypto doesn’t make you a money services business. FinCEN Guidance FIN-2019-G001 treats a person who “obtains virtual currency to purchase goods or services” on their own behalf as a user, exempt from MSB registration.

Non-US payers have their own version of this

If you’re not a US company, none of the 1099 machinery applies to you, but an equivalent regime probably does, and 2026 is the year most of them switched on.

The UK started collecting under the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework on 1 January 2026, with the first reports due between 1 January and 31 May 2027 and penalties of up to £300 per user. Registration and user notification run to 31 January 2027. Note the scope carefully: this binds a Reporting Cryptoasset Service Provider, a business that transacts cryptoassets on behalf of users. An ordinary company paying its own contractors in stablecoins is not an RCASP and has no CARF filing duty. Its exchange, however, will report the company’s data.

The EU’s DAC8 (Directive (EU) 2023/2226) applies from 1 January 2026, with first exchanges running to 30 September 2027. Same structural point: the reporting obligation sits on crypto-asset service providers, not on employers.

There’s a separate EU issue that does bind payers directly. Under MiCA, USDT is an e-money token, Tether has not obtained the required authorisation, and ESMA required EU service providers to complete a sell-only wind-down by 31 March 2025. The MiCA transitional period ended 1 July 2026. A bilateral transfer isn’t prohibited, but the on-ramps and off-ramps inside the EU are gone. An EU-established payer should be using USDC or EURC, and EURC additionally removes the FX exposure. Our MiCA compliance guide has the detail.

For UK payers there’s a further wrinkle: HMRC treats payment in tokens as a barter transaction, so the payer makes a disposal for CT or CGT purposes, and CRYPTO40100 requires conversion to sterling “at the appropriate rate at the time of each transaction” using “a consistent methodology” with records of that methodology retained. Pick a rate source, write down why, never change it mid-year.

The file you should be able to produce

If an examiner asks about a single contractor payment, this is what should exist:

Before payment - Signed W-9 (US person) or W-8BEN / W-8BEN-E (foreign person), unexpired - A written statement of where the services are performed - A services agreement denominated in fiat, naming the stablecoin as settlement method only - Sanctions screening result for the destination wallet address, dated

At payment - Invoice, in USD or EUR - USD fair market value at the payment timestamp, with the rate source named - Transaction hash, sending address, receiving address, network, token contract address - Your basis in the tokens disposed of, per Rev. Proc. 2024-28

After year end - 1099-NEC filed by 31 January (US payees at or above $2,000 for TY2026), or - 1042-S and 1042 filed by 15 March (US-source payments to foreign persons), or - A documented explanation of why neither was required

That last line is the one people skip, and it’s the one that turns a five-minute conversation into a three-month examination. “We didn’t file because the services were performed in Manila and we hold a valid W-8BEN dated 12 March 2026” is a complete answer. “We didn’t think we had to” is not.

Keeping that file coherent across 40 contractors and 12 payment runs is the actual work. Systems that put the payment, the screening result, the invoice and the ledger entry in the same record make it survivable, VaultNow handles bulk payouts with AML screening on the addresses before the send and invoicing in the same place, which is mostly useful because the evidence assembles itself rather than being reconstructed in April. Whatever you use, the test is the same: can you produce the six items above for any payment, from any month, without opening a spreadsheet somebody built by hand?

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to issue a 1099 to foreign contractors?

Generally no, if the contractor is a foreign person and performed the services outside the United States. That income is foreign-source, which puts it outside both the 1099 series and chapter 3 withholding. You should still collect a Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E to document the position. If any of the work was performed inside the US, that portion is US-source and reports on Form 1042-S instead.

Do US companies issue 1099 to foreign contractors who provided a W-8BEN?

No. The W-8BEN establishes that the payee is a foreign person, which takes them out of 1099 reporting altogether. The form isn’t filed with the IRS, you retain it. If the services were US-source, the reporting form is 1042-S, not 1099, and the W-8BEN is what supports any treaty rate you apply.

Can a foreign company give me a W-9?

No. Form W-9 certifies that the payee is a US person. A foreign entity signing one is certifying something untrue. The correct form is W-8BEN-E. This is worth pushing back on when a vendor sends a W-9 out of habit, accepting it doesn’t protect you, and it undermines the documentation you’d rely on in an examination.

Do I need to withhold taxes for foreign contractors?

Only on US-source payments, meaning services performed inside the United States. The default rate is 30% under chapter 3, reduced or eliminated by treaty where an individual contractor files Form 8233, not W-8BEN, which excludes US-performed services, together with a US TIN. Services performed entirely abroad carry no withholding. Without a valid W-8, the presumption rules can force you to withhold 30% regardless.

What is the 1099-NEC threshold for tax year 2026?

$2,000, up from $600. It applies to tax years beginning after 2025, so tax year 2026, filed in January 2027, is the first affected year. Inflation adjustment starts in calendar year 2027. The filing deadline stays 31 January for both the IRS copy and the recipient copy.

How do I report a contractor payment made in USDT?

At its US dollar fair market value on the date of payment, on Form 1099-NEC box 1a, exactly as you’d report a cash payment. Separately, record your own disposition of the tokens: an ordinary deduction at FMV, plus capital gain or loss against your basis, tracked wallet-by-wallet under Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(j), with Rev. Proc. 2024-28 as the safe harbor for pre-2025 basis.

Does paying contractors in crypto require Form 1099-DA?

No, not for the payer. Form 1099-DA is a broker form, and the final regulations define brokers as parties taking possession of digital assets being sold by their customers. Paying your own contractors isn’t broker activity. Your exchange will issue you a 1099-DA on your own sales, and a third-party crypto payroll vendor may have its own obligations, but the paying company doesn’t file one.

What records do I need to keep, and for how long?

Withholding agents should retain copies of information returns, or be able to reconstruct the data, for at least three years after the reporting due date. Keep W-8 forms for their validity period plus the limitations period. For crypto payments, add the per-payment valuation record, timestamp, USD value, named rate source, and the transaction hash. Our guide to crypto bookkeeping covers structuring that in the ledger, and crypto accounting for business covers the wider treatment.


Most of the anxiety about a 1099 for foreign contractors comes from treating it as a crypto question, or a residency question, when it’s a sourcing question with a paperwork answer. Establish where the work happens. Collect the right W-8 before you pay. File the 1099-NEC for US payees even when you think you’re under the line, because it buys Section 530 protection you’ll want if classification is ever challenged. And keep a fiat reserve, because every withholding obligation in this area is denominated in dollars no matter what you paid in.

Do this in one sitting. Open your contractor list and mark each one US person or non-US person, then, separately, where the work is physically performed. Those two columns produce the whole answer. Chase a signed W-9 or W-8 for anyone missing one and diary the expiry three calendar years out. Flag anyone who spent days in the US this year and get a day count in writing. Then decide, in a sentence you’d be happy to show an examiner, why each contractor gets a 1099-NEC, a 1042-S, or nothing at all, and keep the sentence. VaultNow keeps the payment, the AML screening result and the invoice on one record with per-user permissions, which is mostly useful because the fair market value and the transaction hash are already sitting there when you build the file in January. Around this: paying international contractors on choosing a rail, the crypto contractor agreement on the clauses and invoice fields, and cryptocurrency address screening on the check that happens before the money moves.

General information on how these rules work, not legal or tax advice. Positions are stated as at 26 August 2026; rates, thresholds and filing dates change, and the right answer turns on facts specific to you. Check the current text of anything cited here with your own adviser before acting on it.

Read next